Well the actual study is here: |
|
Well the actual study is here: |
|
I just read the study and they say that they used 440–670 KHz ultrasound. They said that low intensity, low frequency Ultrasound (LILFU) was used since both mathematical models and experimental data indicated that the optimal gain between transcranial transmission and brain absorption for Ultrasound is ∼600–700 KHz |
|
Last edited by westonci; 11-02-2008 at 11:42 PM.
Ah, well then a 1Mhz function generator would work nicely. |
|
Im not a tech wiz by a long shot, but do you know what they mean by "remotely" when they say "Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound" |
|
Well to my understanding, the ultrasonic transducer (to transduce is to transform energy into another form) transforms the high frequency waveforms (it says "low", but that's a relative term referring to the normal 20-40Mhz ultrasonic range) to physical vibrations. A normal sonic transducer is the simple speaker, using electromagetism to generate physical vibrations. |
|
I just read the study from here |
|
Well it's not as easy as "just trying" it; accurate ultrasonic transduction is difficult to reproduce without the necessary, often expensive, equipment. I've worked with electronics and the like quite a bit myself, and can see some parts being replaced by more simple, cheaper circuits, but other parts (i.e., the transducer) will still cost a few grand. |
|
Bookmarks