Re: The Meaning in dreams?
Quote:
Originally posted by TrumpetNerd
I am doing a research paper on the meaning of dreams. I strongly believe that dreams do have meaning. I believe they can be therapeutic and can reveal things about people that would not be realized in any other state of awareness.
I am running into a problem, though. Most everything I've looked up had to do with physiological studies of the brain- and why dreams would have limited or even no meaning at all.
I mean... dreaming isn't a clear phenomenon that can be studied in solely physical ways. It just seems like... scientists study every physical aspect of the brain and think they know everything there is to know about dreaming. I read in an article by Robert Wilkerson that there's kind of a \"brain-mind\" split and that the mind can't be physically studied like the brain.
I wanted to know if anyone possibly knew any resources that could refute some of the scientific statements made by these people, pertaining to dreams' meanings. I'm not trying to say that they're wrong about their research- all I'm saying is, there's more to dreaming than the physical aspects of the brain. I know that when it comes to dreaming, opinions are what we have to rely on. I'm not saying that's a bad thing- I think it's a great thing, because we can all hypothesize and come up with a million new theories, and never be completely right or wrong.
So basically, I guess I'm asking.... what are the known facts about dreams? What can we safely assume is true, and what aspects of dreaming are completely left to our own opinions?
Thanks!!
I just posted something elsewhere that seems also to apply here:
Quote:
Originally posted by Belisarius
I had the concept of dreams as being a string of unstable, disconnected perception that our minds try to understand by impressing our a priori conceptions upon it. We dream of something entirely senseless, and then turn it into a familiar object. That is why dreams are usually in familiar places, with familiar people. We aren't equipped to make sense of dreams so we use our conceptions from waking hours and try to fit them onto the senseless flow of dream perception.
So then the interpretation of dreams can be thought of as finding out why your mind applies these a priori conceptions to the somewhat random flow of raw dream.
I know where you get this hypothesis from. Scientific Researchers, who are geared only for Quantitative Analysis and are not in the least equiped for Qualitative or Aesthetic Analysis suppose that Dreams are random firings of Nerve Cells. They suppose this because the can count firings of brain cells. They ignore Meaning because they cannot Quantify Meaning.
That is how nearsighted and myoptic Science is.
We KNOW Dreams have meaning.
Simply look at the Dreams of our New Japanese Friend in the Dream Interpretation Section and then try to convince us that Dreams are not Coherently Meaningful.
Now, you may have disordered Dreams, but this is because you have not yet established any progress in integrating your waking self into your Dream Self. Your Dreams seem disordered only because your Memory of what had happened was faulty and misfiring. With some experience in Dreaming, your Dreams can become just as Coherent as those of our Japanese Friend and many of our other Dreamers who would never suspect their Dreams of originating in random nerve end discharges.
The Scientific Community is simply incapable of examining all of the Uncontrolled Variables involved with discerning Qualitative and Aesthetic Meaning. There Reaction to this Inability is to deny Meaning alltogether. If they can't bean-count it then it follows that it does not exist.