Thanks 
I read so many books maybe more than 100 but the most inspiring, the most profound "philosopher" was Buddha. You can find his teachings online, It's not a book It's just texts. He talked about atoms before even "science" existed, I read that he inspired Einstein, and that Nikola Tesla was inspired by hindu texts (so it's the same with few differences). Its not a surprise because those texts are so rich, so profound, they sound like ancient science... In fact even the actual science, especially quantum physics are just going back to what was already said centuries before. Its like evolution is just a circle and not linear... we go back to what we already knew in the past: that the world is just made of conscioussness (energy).
But you know, above all those texts and books were just like doors or windows: it showed me a direction. It wasn't something that I just read and accept blindly. It is my experience, my self observation that made all that readings "in place" like a puzzle and all that knowledge became like a second nature. For exemple you may accept that this is a dream on a intellectual level, you accept that idea but you gain nothing from it as long it doesnt become your experience your second nature.
I recommand that you read the text Lankavatara Sutra Its very clear about what Buddha thought of this 3D world.
Some quotes from that "book":
"All such notions as causation, succession, atoms, primary elements, that make up personality, personal soul, Supreme Spirit, Sovereign God, Creator, are all figments of the imagination and manifestations of mind."
"All that is seen in the world is devoid of effort and action because all things in the world are like a dream, or like an image miraculously projected. This is not comprehended by the philosophers and the ignorant, but those who thus see things see them truthfully. Those who see things otherwise walk in discrimination and, as they depend upon discrimination, they cling to dualism."
The error in these erroneous teachings (of philosophers) that are generally held by the philosophers lies in this: they do not recognise that the objective world rises from the mind (consciousness) itself; they do not understand that the whole mind-system also rises from the mind itself; but depending upon these manifestations of the mind as being real they go on discriminating them, like the simple-minded ones that they are, cherishing the dualism of this and that, of being and nonbeing,ignorant of the fact that there is but one common Essence (consciousness).
"On the contrary my teaching is based upon the recognition that the objective world, like a vision, is a manifestation of the mind itself."
My teaching transcends the whole conception of being and non-being; it has nothing to do with birth, abiding and destruction; nor with existence and
non-existence. I teach that the multitudinousness of objects have no reality in themselves but are only seen of the mind and, therefore, are of the nature of maya and a dream. I teach the nonexistence of things because they carry no signs of any inherent self-nature. It is true that in one sense they are seen and discriminated by the senses as individualised objects; but in another sense, because of the absence of any characteristic marks of self-nature, they are not seen but are only imagined. In one sense they are graspable, but in another sense, they are not graspable. When it is clearly understood that there is nothing in the world but what is seen of the mind itself, discrimination no more rises, and the wise are established in their true abode which is the realm of quietude. The ignorant discriminate and work trying to adjust themselves to external conditions, and are constantly perturbed in mind; unrealities are imagined and discriminated, while realities are unseen and ignored. It is not so with the wise.
"...he must recognise and be fully convinced that this triple world is nothing but a complex manifestation of one's mental activities; that it is devoid of selfness and its belongings; that there are no strivings, no comings, no goings. He must recognise and accept the fact that this triple world is manifested and imagined as real only under the influence of habit-energy that has been accumulated since the beginning less past by reason of memory, false-imagination, false-reasoning, and attachments."
PS: when Buddha talks about "mind" he talks about consciousness because in Buddhism those words are the same. What we call mind is often limited to the brain, but Buddha said many times that All is mind and made of mind. Exactly like we think of a dreams.
|
|
Bookmarks