I understand nomenclature can be a finicky business. I still think there should be something, however, so I propose OILD: oneirogen induced lucid dream. I prefer a generic category, unlike GILD for galantamine. I was originally thinking broader, like, chemically facilitate lucid dreams, any chemical involvement from paint thinner to B6, but oneirogen is not only a cool word, it's directly pertinent here.

@Zoth, you say my first description is a DEILD, but I thought a DEILD actually requires the dreamer to wake up. Would you still use the term DEILD if the dreamer is exactly 0% awake between dreams? As for myself, I do a mix, something with no awakeness whatsoever, and sometimes closer to wakefulness I suppose (not that I think about that potential much, but upon reflection I suspose I am floating nearer the surface of wakefulness), but almost entirely I never wake up, nor have any awareness of my body of any sort whatsoever, so there's no need to "not move".

As it is, WILD and DILD simply denote a quality the event, namely when conscious awareness begins. MILD is certainly a technique in that you much perform it. EILD isn't a technique in that, other than putting it on, your don't perform steps. So I suppose a strong distinction can be made between techniques (i.e. steps taken, which to me FILD would fully count, since steps must be performed), and facilitators, such as dream masks, music alarms, and oneirogens. As far as I can tell, there is no strong distinction among existing terms as to steps/instigators. And WILD is primarily neither a step nor an instigator, but it does have a serious of steps that furthers its occurrence, so in a sense, it's a goal with related practices/techniques/steps.

Personally, I think OILD would be a good addition, primarily because such pursuits are extremely common.