Thread: What is the evidence that dreams are produced by the brain ?

So where is that study ? Are you saying that science KNOWS what is mind, what is a dream, what is life, what is universe, what is awareness. Or they pretend to know it? Or They know a little bit?
Sorry but I doubt that they KNOW all these things. They may observe effects on the brain (in the case of dreams)... But they can't say nothing more.
I even doubt the evolution theory, the big bang theory, the "everything is meaningless" theory, the "everything is accident, or chance" theory. You seem like an religious, you just accept blindly what the "all knowing science" tells you. You seem that for you science is God, even if there is no evidence. In "scientific" theories there is often a word "Coincidence, Chance or accident".

Like I said science is really cool! But when you make conclusions without enough evidences it is not science.
If science knew all about life, universe, mind... believe me This world would be a much better place.
The day science will KNOW what dreams or mind is this thread will be just... Impossible. Because when you have a real evidence it is impossible to argue against it.

Originally Posted by astralboy

So where is that study ? Are you saying that science KNOWS what is mind, what is a dream, what is life, what is universe, what is awareness. Or they pretend to know it? Or They know a little bit?
Sorry but I doubt that they KNOW all these things. They may observe effects on the brain (in the case of dreams)... But they can't say nothing more.
I even doubt the evolution theory, the big bang theory, the "everything is meaningless" theory, the "everything is accident, or chance" theory. You seem like an religious, you just accept blindly what the "all knowing science" tells you. You seem that for you science is God, even if there is no evidence. In "scientific" theories there is often a word "Coincidence, Chance or accident".

Science provides rationally backed up statistics, it's up to you to choose which statistical inference method you use. Frankly I don't care, fact is science only gave us the evidence, It's up to us how we interpret that. No one asked you to follow Bayesian or sequential statistics etc, most people do, if you want to reject everything that's fine, just don't push it on the us.

Originally Posted by astralboy

Like I said science is really cool! But when you make conclusions without enough evidences it is not science.
If science knew all about life, universe, mind... believe me This world would be a much better place.
The day science will KNOW what dreams or mind is this thread will be just... Impossible. Because when you have a real evidence it is impossible to argue against it.

Here is where it get's great. The hypocrite is finally emerging, an entire thread arguing how "science" deals only in absolutes and you go and say that something is impossible.