 Originally Posted by Howie
I think it stands to reason that social inequality has played a role in the development in the womans role in science, don't you think.
We have obvious differences. Some I feel are evolutionary. Meant to be? Not meaning it cannot and are not changing.
Our culture is changing so it provides the forum for us as men and woman to change
Perhaps. However, some differences are beyond our power, such as males being more developmentally vulnerable. It is just plain fact that male embryo's die significantly more than female ones.
Also, the females enlarge hemispheres and more concentrated corpus callosum give rise to their emotional abilities. Whereas, males endorphin levels ilicit their pain tolerance.
What can change this? In a life time, you would have to work very hard between the ages of 2 to puberty to deliberately fight the nature and nurturing aspect of the individual. In the long run? Evolutionary changes are all that could eventually make a significant impact.
~
|
|
Bookmarks