Thread: Anonymous vows to destroy Fox News on November 5th

Facebook's one thing, take that down, millions of young whores cry because they can't play farmville... then go back to texting.

But getting rid of Faux News would be the greatest achievement ever.
I Certainly hope they do.

Originally Posted by xXxUnumtriumxXx

Facebook's one thing, take that down, millions of young whores cry because they can't play farmville... then go back to texting.

But getting rid of Faux News would be the greatest achievement ever.
I Certainly hope they do.

Except they should be protecting the right of anybody to broadcast whatever they want.

You can't have a crusade about how freedom of media is a human right and torrenting should be legal a priori etc. etc., and then throw a paddy when a particular outlet says something you don't agree with (or even lies). That's not how freedom of speech works; you can't only support it for people who agree with you. So this whole thing is really extremely puerile.

Originally Posted by Xei

Except they should be protecting the right of anybody to broadcast whatever they want.

You can't have a crusade about how freedom of media is a human right and torrenting should be legal a priori etc. etc., and then throw a paddy when a particular outlet says something you don't agree with (or even lies). That's not how freedom of speech works; you can't only support it for people who agree with you. So this whole thing is really extremely puerile.

There's a difference between freedom of speech and purposely inciting controversy and hatred.

Originally Posted by tommo

There's a difference between freedom of speech and purposely inciting controversy and hatred.

...not at all like 4chan itself then.

Derp.

Why is this even a big deal? It's just a website......


The way the title of this thread sounds and the dramatic music on the youtube video I thought a group of people were going to blow up the Fox News television broadcasting station or something

Originally Posted by Xei

Except they should be protecting the right of anybody to broadcast whatever they want.

You can't have a crusade about how freedom of media is a human right and torrenting should be legal a priori etc. etc., and then throw a paddy when a particular outlet says something you don't agree with (or even lies). That's not how freedom of speech works; you can't only support it for people who agree with you. So this whole thing is really extremely puerile.

I get where you're coming from, and I agree, but the opposing opinion at least has to be mature and educated about it.

There's a big difference between protecting the right to voice one's opinion and protecting the ability to feed harmful lies to millions of people.