People told me there's a brunette in this video?
Where is she??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcweHzpaiHY
Printable View
People told me there's a brunette in this video?
Where is she??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcweHzpaiHY
ummm are you a pedophile or just a pervert?
I'm male so basically both... potentially.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ickarus
well, you passed the test...she's on the right
Who?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ickarus
He is attempting to be funny by implying that he didn't even notice the other girl because of the blonde. I would be lead to assume this considering the blonde has oversized boobs at the age of like.. 14. Girl who develops early do not belong on the internet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ickarus
Dude, she's 16+. Yeah and in my country you're free to fuck whomever you want who is 14+, so there.
IndeedQuote:
I defy you to watch this video and even notice that a second girl appears in it.
I guess I'm weird. I liked the Brunette.
Oh. That's cool. Anyways, I think she looks a bit young. Besides, I like brunettes anyways.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korittke
I liked the brunette, but I kept getting my gaze forced away from me, lol. I couldn't help it.
Maybe I'm just weird, but I feel bad for her, assuming that she is a minor and whatnot, maybe she isn't always like that, but if she already goes about her life with that sort of promiscuity....I dno, it's sad.
And her face made her look like a total retard anyways....
Like I said, early and overdeveloped underage girls do NOT belong on the internet. Sometimes when girls like that develop early, they're still just little girls at heart, and now they have all these older guys coming onto them, before they've even got a sexual desire. Ontop of someone uploading a video of them for pure sexual intentions (the information describing the video on Youtube leads me to believe someone else most likely uploaded it), I'm sure she deals with daily problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastro
And yeah, she does look like an idiot, that could complicate things.
did anyone else notice that the blonde is wearing a patch on her left arm? maybe birth control patch, or nicotine. i dont know much about either
Wow, I'm so impressed at the maturity some of you are showing! :content: I wasn't expecting it.
so... did you not notice the brunette either? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mes Tarrant
Assuming I am one of the people you are referring to....Quote:
Originally Posted by Mes Tarrant
Does this mean that you thought I was immature?
I'm hurt Mes...:P
^^ :cheeky: Not at all. I meant the forum as a whole, I suppose.
I think your pupil silenced the immature ones.
Hence no responses from Man of Steel, Mark75, Oneironaut, etc...
Well that's not very fair. I think Mes was talking about me... *LOL!*Quote:
Originally Posted by AspirationRealized
Huh? What country has that law? I know that it is illegal for American citizens to go outside of the country and have sex with girls who are under, uh, 18 (or 16 or 17 or something).Quote:
Originally Posted by Korittke
Age of consent here is 14+.
Still, what a little hobag.
14 and consenting in Canada as far as I know, but still half your age plus seven is the socially acceptable formula, and we all know it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastro
Oh boy... the fun squad arrived.Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazeO XD
Here, just attempting to have sex with a nonexistent 14 year old will land you on Dateline NBC to be humiliated in front of the whole country just before you get sentenced to six years in prison.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBeelzy
http://youtube.com/watch?v=une0jezHZHU
http://youtube.com/watch?v=8CgUXWIOLLw
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBeelzy
You can't have sex with them though.
They are too young for me, i'm almost 24 now. Time sure passes you by....
Quote:
Originally Posted by LucidFlanders
Not that I condone sex with someone under 18 or anything but I'm pretty sure that's what age of consent means. If they are at the age of consent you can legally have sex with them.
1. Promiscuity is not a bad thing.
2. She doesn't have sexual desires? My ass.
3. In G-Land, you can only get busted if there's uncertainty whether consent was actually given or there was some kind of psychological influence involved.
What was shown in the video wouldn't be allowed though. Any sort of sexual contact between 14-15 that is not directly linked to an ongoing romance is considered exploitation of lack of sexual autonomy (if the culprit is above 21). For 18-21, this is up to the younger person to decide, as long as there is no money involved. Once the younger person hits 16, she is considered on par with adults and not protected by law (sexual underage thus means <16). But even for <16 what counts is the statement of the younger person, so long as there is not a trace of psychological manipulation or lack of sexual autonomy.
And that formation of law actually makes sense, because teenagers aren't children.
Also I reckon none of the people in To Catch A Predator were actually imprisoned.
Why do you reckon that? Lots of them have been given sentences as long as six or seven years. Did you ever see the rabbi who lost it more than anybody else in the history of the series? He got a six year sentence. Others have too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korittke
Well, I'm not American. :P I just watched some critical videos about the show and the head of Perverted Justice and read that NBC is getting their asses sued over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind
Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind
I'm liking the quote in the first video:
"I have an older friend who wants a virgin lol"
laughing out loud. really.
Actually UM, I believe that 14 is the legal age of consent as long as the person that they're having sex with is less than 2 years older than them. Still, I'm too old to notice either of them as cute in anything other than a little kid way.
I didn't know this show was so epic.
- "Why would you send these pictures to someone who said they were 13 years old?
- "I send them to everybody"
- "So this is like your calling card, you send a picture of your genitals to everybody you meet?"
- Girl: "What did you bring me?"
- Guy: "A drink and some Kit-Kat."
- Hansen: "Looks like you brought enough stuff to move in."
LOL, this is A-class entertainment. I mean... this show would go as a complete satire, it's so funny how Hansen always says the exact same things and comes up with witty sarcastic remarks.
See here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwFr_...eature=related
Yeah, that's true. I was talking about for adults.Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja9578
Hehe, I love the "formula." Just out of curiousity, I had to see where it breaks, though. It basically would mean that no one could ever date until they reach 14. A 13-year-old is too young for even another 13-year-old!Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBeelzy
I propose a new formula: 3/5 your age + 3 years to find the youngest you should be dating. This only breaks down at 6 years, which is probably a good thing. :D
Our two theories meet at the 40/27 point.
(all of the above is silliness, of course)
Hansen quotes: " 'You shouldn't be in this chat, lots of perverts in here..'. What did you mean by that?"
Guy: "People who just want to have sex with her"."
Hansen: "People like yourself."
Hansen: " 'I like to suck cock, play with cocks, lick your nipples.' Where does it say that in the bible? Is that the old testament or the new testament?"
Watch very carefully from 0:16 to 0:18. She's on the right hand of the screen. You'll have to be quick though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korittke
I don't think age should be a moral issue when two adults are involved. If a 60 year old sleeps with a 23 year old consentually, that is quite fine with me. I know that when I am 60, I will not be excluding 23 year olds from my list of considerations. I will probably have to be megarich or famous or a mafia don to pull that off, but I will always see it as an option.Quote:
Originally Posted by skysaw
That's what's great about being male.Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind
http://www.vidmax.com/index.php/videos/view/1882
I think I'm going to go ahead and resent that comment. :huh:Quote:
Originally Posted by AspirationRealized
Way ahead of you. :angry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of Steel
Haha.
If there's a will, there's a way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korittke
Rolf. You know I said that because I love you guys.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneironaut
Except Mark75. My attachment to him is strictly lust.
I see that now, when I wrote that I was talking about a few posts back, I didn't see the second page :chuckle:Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ickarus
No, it means you can date them, but not screw them. They are underage, and it's against the law to have sex with an underager if you're 18+.
uhh im pretty sure age of consent has to do with sex, and not dating. and yep here's a link to back me up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consentQuote:
Originally Posted by LucidFlanders
If the age of consent is 18 then you would be right, it would be illegal to screw them, but if the age of consent was say 16 and you had sex with a 16 year old it wouldn't be illegal.
It's for dating, not for fucking. That link is BS because it's always edited by different people all the time.
Well lucid flanders since you didn't like the wikipedia link, i went and found some more links for ya. And before you dismiss Wikipedia you should know studies say its about as accurate as any encyclopedia.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&d...ition&ct=title
http://www.avert.org/ageconsent.htm
The first link has the definitions of age of consent and the links to the sites where it is from. The second link is like an FAQ.
And Before you get all hot and bothered again, you should know that different countries have different ages of consent, so 18 may be the age of consent for where you live, but it isn't across the world.
Could care less what those say, it's for dating, everyone i know irl all know it's for dating, everywhere i have went people say it's for dating.
:roll: try doing some research yourself, although it would probably do no good since it's all going to say the same thing the links i provided say.Quote:
Originally Posted by LucidFlanders
Edit= after i read what i posted i decided it was too mean so i made it nicer, im done with argument, it's a stupid argument anyways.
That's the most moronic thing I've ever heard. You can't set a fucking age limit for dating.Quote:
Originally Posted by LucidFlanders
Yes, what Korittke said.
Also, I said that the age of consent in Canada was 14, and although it was true at the time, it is now 16. Probably a good idea, seeing as the old law was from a hundred odd years ago, but either way, the law, and the formula are more like guidelines. I'm not into super young women, but if I meet a girl and I don't think she's underage I'm not going to card her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korittke
Yes you can, aslong as you have parents consent.:roll: