Originally posted by Belisarius+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Belisarius)</div>
<!--QuoteBegin-Kaniaz
Just because people's experiences are \"consistent\" doesn't give so much as an ounce of credibilty to it.
Science relies completely on the consistency of people's experiences, do you give science so much as an ounce of credibility?[/b]
Note the quotation marks around "consistent", meaning that I don't think they're very reputable, or indeed consistent, at all. Some random website regurgiating what some other random website said doesn't make for very good scientific evidence. I shall clarify my posts in that sense just for that from now on. You knew what I meant anyway, you just felt like starting an argument based on a word game. I suggest Scrabble for urges like this.