 Originally Posted by juroara
rational? please
the truth is if you don't believe in the super natural, it is simply because you have never experienced it
it is rational to believe in that which you have experienced. it is however human nature to discard an experience if it doesn't fit in a predefined box of what reality is
I have had freaky paranormal things happen to me that i cannot explain, but the more i think about it...i just can't explain something that happened while labelling something that i think is paranormal. I've had visions, but there is a name for it now instead of "visions of the dead warning me" or whatever. Also, the whole spirit thing is fading on me...there are so many dead people, yet there is no evidence at all that spirits are real, just stories, and people listening to static trying to pick out noises when it's just static. NDE's are not proven, even ask people studying them, they don't know WHEN the person slips out of their body, just that they have a clear picture of what they think is happening in the room.
 Originally Posted by spaceexplorer
I have never been to spain, but I believe in it because there is plenty of evidence to prove its existence.
Having not experienced something is not the reason we do not believe in such things as the paranormal, it's the lack of supporting evidence.
There are plenty of things I have not experienced that I will take as true, because there is evidence to support the claims.
Offer some evidence other than anecdotal stories and strong beliefs.
Thats not much to ask, you can do it with ANY other real phenomena, so why not the paranormal?
Why is the paranormal given special rights to avoid having to prove itself?
Well...we don't know how the mind works yet (atleast what i have gathered from some of the smart posters here who know their shit), the brain still has alot of mystery to it, so the paranormal can easily be some piece we have not yet discovered. If we somehow have a "spirit" perhaps it's able tocontroll parts of the brain, and we think it's how the brain works when it really is just the spirit controlling it or whatever. Far fetched theory, though.
 Originally Posted by pojmaster17q
I think one of the greatest benefits of this is that new members won't come in here, excited about lucid dreaming, and then start believing in all this stuff without question. Thus they won't become disappointed/delusional. I'm not calling anyone here delusional, but eventually it's going to come to one of those ends. Dreamwalkers/Nightstalkers? Come on. The whole thing is just so erratic and disorganized that it's hardly believable. Not to mention how pretty much there's no explanation but it's all created by your dreaming mind.
Holy shit, I just realized that Ghost94 said about the same thing.
EDIT: also, I've read a few OBE/whatever guides and if you switched "OBE" with "LD" and "OBE induction" with "WILD" I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between it and a shitty WILD guide.
It's only delusional because there is no evidence for shared dreaming, if there was shared dreaming then this really would not be as crazy as it seems. But all we got is peoples stories, and you know how people are. They think the dream they have is real, when it really was just their dreams reality, not a waking life reality.
|
|
Bookmarks