^^ Hmm. It's curious that you didn't include the second and third paragraphs of my post, which, though they don't line up exactly with what you said, come pretty close, and certainly show that I was saying that there is much we do not know yet about the nature of dreaming. Maye you missed them, so here is the whole thing:
 Originally Posted by Sageous
^^ Actually, there is plenty of proof that dreams are just happening inside your head, including years of brain-scan studies using fMRI machines (devices that allow us to see brain activity as it is happening), psychological studies, and decades of sleep study. As far as science is concerned, it's pretty clear that dreams are indeed manufactured inside your head, and you are not literally visiting other worlds when you dream, lucid or not. In other words, the proof that we dream inside our heads is already in, and has been for years; no belief necessary. But that, I believe, is not the end of the story:
Even with that proof in hand, there is still quite a bit we don't know yet about the true nature of dreaming. Sure, the worlds we visit are created inside our heads, but at the same time might we be making a connection to things beyond the workings of our many neurons alone? Could we be psychically sharing our created worlds with other dreamers, and vise-verse? These are just a couple of potential aspects of dreaming that could exist just fine even with the scientific proof noted, and discovering that they are possible through lucid dreaming would open some amazing doors for all of us, and I for one would be delighted if they could be proven. Belief in wonderful things is a fine stance for an open, inquiring mind, but to take that next step and convert that faith to actual knowledge is a far more powerful tool for that same mind.
So Snoop's question is valid, and sincere, I think: If lucid dreamers can find some sort of proof that they are experiencing worlds beyond the confines of their own skulls, this world would become a much more interesting place!
As you can see, I never said we know all there is to know about dreaming. In my opinion we have barely scratched the surface, as the physiological part is the easy part, research-wise. And yes, we still know very little about dreaming; yes, all that brain imagery and research might just be coincidental, because activity happens to occur at the same time that a subject says she was dreaming; and yes, as we are with so many things involving consciousness and cognition, research still depends on the testimony of possibly errant individuals.
There is plenty to find out yet, but we do seem to have established that there is a physiological link between the brain and dreams... for all we know (and as I implied in the second paragraph of that post) the brain activity might just be our active perception of other worlds -- ethereal transmission and reception equipment firing up to put us in communication with distant spiritual places, and this equipment is able to defy all known laws of physics to connect us -- perhaps even deliver us -- to other worlds. I personally doubt that that is true (and, anecdotally, given the amount of traveling I've done in dreams to date, I think I would have at least suspected as much by now), but I would be truly delighted to find out it was.
I agree with you completely Voldmer, in that there is much to be learned. I also hold as true that advanced lucid dreaming will unlock many wonderful truths and phenomena, probably some that haven't even occurred to us yet. But I also think it wise to start with the obvious -- i.e., that brain activity and dream creation are related somehow -- and work out from there. To assume from the get-go that we are visiting other worlds, and then say that such travel is possible because you can't prove otherwise, tends to create illusory concepts that conceal what's really going on in dreams, rather than reveal it. It is great fun to imagine that we visit other worlds when we dream, but there may be wisdom in first assuming that we are just creating those worlds in our heads, just to avoid deluding ourselves and leaving the path to real knowledge, distracted by wonderful misconceptions; later, with experience, we will learn the truth through LD'ing anyway; why risk obscuring that truth, or preventing its discovery, with possibly misleading fantasy?
tl;dr: Yes, because the "proof" lies exclusively in the realm of physiological observations linked perhaps coincidentally to subjects' testimonies, we have barely scratched the surface of what we know about dreaming; I never said otherwise. And, as the rest of my post implies, much more of what we learn might reveal currently supernatural connections between dreaming and other realms.
I hope I was clearer this time, and also that you made it past the first paragraph!
|
|
Bookmarks