It's pointless to argue about telepathy here to some people who don't experience them It's best to just say "Ok you think this, but i know this, what you say about that, because i experience it." then they will be quiet. If not then they are in doubt.
Quote Originally Posted by shadowofwind View Post
No it doesn't work that way. All of my dream telepathy experiences are over hundreds or thousands of miles.



Yes it requires new physics. Since the words 'unknown dimension' are in common usage as "physics we don't understand", beyond that the statement almost seems to me to be a tautology.



To use quantum entanglement for communication, first you have to physically send the particles from one party to the other. If you can do that, in the context of shared dreaming, then there's no need for the entanglement. Also its not necessary for two people to meet prior to telepathically sharing information.

Can we stop now with debunking physics conjectures made by people who are unfamiliar with physics? Likewise, the "if shared dreaming is real, then it should be easily provable by [....]" ground has been gone over many times also. Nobody we know has that much control over shared dreaming. Sivason repeated that point as recently as a week ago. The shared dreaming opponents keep pronouncing that shared dreaming should behave in a certain way, as if they would somehow know, then saying that its unreal if it doesn't behave in that way. It doesn't behave that way. Its not easily controllable, and there are no mechanisms within the realm of existing physics theory that can account for it. Once we're clear about these two points, whether we call it 'natural' or 'supernatural' or 'paranormal' is just labels, it doesn't matter.