Hiya Loaf!
I know what you mean man, I am the same way right now too. I feel like I'm in Alcoholics Anonymous, except for sleep schedules!
lol.
Printable View
Hiya Loaf!
I know what you mean man, I am the same way right now too. I feel like I'm in Alcoholics Anonymous, except for sleep schedules!
lol.
Well, I guess we'd be sitting in the corner, lonely, together, since I haven't been able to get good sleep and lucidity lately, either.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loaf
Oh, wait. I'm still a lucidity virgin. :( :? :cry: :P
Yeah I know I haven't been very active here, but I'm still following it too! School has started but I'm still basically on my summer sleep schedule, which means I don't get much sleep and wake up too late to write anything down. I'll definitely try this weekend, and of course, all of you are free to come visit my dreams as well :p
poo00OO00oost Djs
Well said. I was also of the opinion it was not worth posting non Chichen Itza dreams, but after seeing the synchronicities you find on "normal" dreams, I decided to start posting at least a short sketch of what I dream on weekend nights.
So what's this thing about no posts for a week? Have you all transcended to different co-linearity and this is your ruin to be found by some future dreamarchelogies or has some collective dry-spell on you or have you just moved the form of discussion to your dreamjournal?
;.-)
We have all ascended into constant contact on the dreamplane. We no longer have use for your petty "forums"
I think that the dryspell thing was spot on though. We need a pick me up.
My history teacher mentioned sacrifices at Chichen Itza the other day. Never heard it said, lol. People were like "it sounds like a restaurant". Then he started talking about how they made human salsa or something :| but yeah of course I thought of here haha.
... well, new location time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitties
Bwahahah
We aren't changing locations any time soon.
It was a joke, chill.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atras
Haha I'm chilled, just saying.
hahahaa, sarcasm over the internet is misunderstand, classicQuote:
Originally Posted by Atras
Yeahhh internet sarcasm doesn't always work lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicideking
Wait wait wait, why are you guys using a "No skeptics" rule? A skeptic is someone open to stuff, so are you all going to just shush anyone who is open but doesn't believes on it yet? In fact, I AM a skeptic, one that believes shared dreaming is real too, so why the racism?
What I mean by that is no one is allowed to come into the IOSDP forum and start saying that shared dreaming isn't real. We have heard all of the arguments and the point of the IOSDP is to try and share dreams and we don't need people coming in and telling us its not real. That's what I meant by it. If you don't believe in it that's fine, but we don't want people bringing the shared dreaming arguments to the IOSDP, that's what Beyond Dreaming is for. Maybe I should clarify a little better lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hukif
That isn't skeptics, thats hard-non-believers or hard-atheists, fundies if you must.
WEll i assumed people would understand what I meant. I clarified what I meant on the skeptic policy portion of the first post. And I would clarify it more but I can no longer edit the first post because there is a time limit on how long you can edit a post for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hukif
It felt excluding for me after reading the whole thing, figured you couldn't edit it anylonger anyway, just pointing out it will take some people away from the fun the way it currently is.
Yeah I apologize for that. I too am a skeptic in the sense that I am open minded, I was targeting people who would come to the project and start up pointless debates on the existence of shared dreaming.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hukif
Skeptic in the most pessimistic and negative way*
Is what it should read.
The problem is that "skeptic" used to mean a person with an open mind who would question and put everything to test before discarding it, but nowadays people call themselves skeptics when they are simply dogmatic deniers. Those are the ones who are welcomed to stay out of here. But I agree this should be immediately clear in the rules, maybe by saying "no deniers" instead of "no skeptics".Quote:
Originally Posted by Hukif
I'll need a mod to change the op for me.
>Atras says no skeptics in his thread, everyone knows what he meansQuote:
Originally Posted by Hukif
>start to debate about the definition of the word "skeptic" even though you are an experienced member here and know what he is implying
>proceed to call him a racist despite the word "skeptic" not having any racial slurs associated with it
No disrespect but come on man, you're smarter than that
Maybe the people who felt unwanted didn't feel like posting? Really, when someone makes a post saying "no believers" then believers will feel excluded and not post, its that simple, someone has to talk for them.