Hey there,
Remember though that in scientific terms, studies are done in groups of people, and that results are based on the average or the median of these groups. They incorporate what seems to be true for most people (and in scientific terms most usually means 66%).
Even in these scientific tests, there's people that report having very strong and vivid non-REM dreams. They're simply discounted because there aren't enough of them to be statistically relevant, compared to entirety of the test group.
On an individual basis, that means yes, the chances of you being unable to having vivid non-REM dreams (without training, that's another thing these scientific tests don't factor in), aren't all that great. But that doesn't mean there is no chance. You might be one of the larger group that can't remember non-REM dreams very well. But you might just as well be one of the exceptions that do!
Additionally, in scientific terms we're talking about correlations here, not causal things. And these correlations are never, ever 100%. So what it actually means, translated into normal terms, is that non-REM dreams tend to be vague and hard to remember for MOST people, MOST of the time. And not for ALL people, ALL of the time.
So don't be fooled in thinking it cannot happen because it doesn't happen enough to be statistically valid. There's people that can WILD on the onset of sleep, and there's times when you can have very vivid dreams right at the onset of sleep.
There's simply no way of knowing whether it works for you, until you try. Sure, the chances are it won't, but who knows, you might get lucky.
-Redrivertears-
|
|
Bookmarks